A New York family owned half of a private road, but a fish and game club maintained it for decades; what did the court decide?
Summary
Five judges supported the association and two did not. The association had originally owned only the western half of the private road. The eastern half belonged to the Dix family and its predecessors. The court concluded that the association had established ownership through adverse possession because it had maintained and controlled the entire road for decades.
Description from Times of India.
Who is covering this
-
A New York family owned half of a private road, but a fish and game club maintained it for decades; what did the court decide?
Five judges supported the association and two did not. The association had originally owned only the western half of the private road. The eastern half belonged to the Dix family and its predecessors. The court concluded that the association had established ownership through...






Comments
Comments need JavaScript.