Misinfo Radar
Signals worth a closer look: weak sources, fact-checks, state media, copy-paste campaigns.
Cursor says up to 5,000 users affected by tampered Claude Code extension
Centre 100%100%
Attention level: Low (2 sources)
- Headline mismatch 1 of 2 confidence: low
Articles whose headline says something its own description does not.
- Theregister: Anthropic: That Claude Code extension compromise… couldn't be us
Claudeshop fingers 'malicious actor' in targeted supply-chain attack on Cursor
- Theregister: Anthropic: That Claude Code extension compromise… couldn't be us
Every outlet on this story
| Outlet | Lean | Reliability | Country | Articles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theregister | Center | 65 Mostly factual | GB | 1 |
| Reuters | Center | 92 Very high | GB | 1 |
How this was worked out
The radar does not decide what is true. It lists signals that deserve a closer look, each with its evidence: who covers the story and how they are rated, matching fact-checks, state media, copy-paste campaigns, and headlines that are sensational or do not match their own description.
How INDB scores stories · Data: stories INDB grouped from the outlets on the sources page.