Misinfo Radar
Signals worth a closer look: weak sources, fact-checks, state media, copy-paste campaigns.
Transcript: What Actually Changes People’s Minds About Politics
L 100%
Attention level: Low (1 source)
- Headline mismatch 2 of 2 confidence: low
Articles whose headline says something its own description does not.
- New Republic: Transcript: What Actually Changes People’s Minds About Politics
This is a lightly edited transcript of the October 23 edition of Right Now With Perry Bacon. You can watch the video here or by following this show on YouTube or Substack . Perry Bacon: Good morning… - New Republic: What Actually Changes People’s Minds About Politics
You can watch this episode of Right Now With Perry Bacon above or by following this show on YouTube or Substack . You can read a transcript here . Sarah Stein Lubrano argues that political debates…
- New Republic: Transcript: What Actually Changes People’s Minds About Politics
- Thin coverage 1 confidence: medium Only one or two outlets report this, and none of them rated high for reliability.
Every outlet on this story
| Outlet | Lean | Reliability | Country | Articles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Republic | Left | 68 Mostly factual | US | 2 |
How this was worked out
The radar does not decide what is true. It lists signals that deserve a closer look, each with its evidence: who covers the story and how they are rated, matching fact-checks, state media, copy-paste campaigns, and headlines that are sensational or do not match their own description.
How INDB scores stories · Data: stories INDB grouped from the outlets on the sources page.